I want to sell derivatives on retail commodities:
I
want to sell an European call option: For the price of $100 (paid now),
I will give you the ability to purchase a brand new 17" macbook pro,
2.4gz i7-quadcore, 4g ram, 750gb for $2,000.00, expiring in 90 days.
This macbook pro is listed to cost $2499.00 , so it would appear that
you saved $399 by paying $100 now and $2000 later instead of $2499
later.
Except, I don't just want to do it for that one
macbook pro, but for all products and services on earth. The option can
be a little more exotic having a range of time in which it can be
exercised. E.g. from day 91 and 95 I may choose to exercise it if it
comes into money.
On the used product side, I can try to sell a put
option. This laptop that I just bought for $2499, I want to have the
ability to sell it (in good condition) in 3 years for $1700. And I would
pay $300 today to ensure that this happens. Again, this option is not
traditional in terms of when it can be exercised. Probably pay $300 to
decide to sell it in a period of there month from months 37 through 39
inclusive.
With companies like Apple, Dell, Hp, Lenovo leading
the pack in computer electronics making equipments that are more durable
than previous, and with market having a lot of different people from
consumers wanting latest and bestest to to consumers who are willing to
buy an used iPad-1 for $200 when iPad-3 is on the market for $500. I
feel that I ought to have bought a put option for my macbook pro that
just had its battery explode from "normal operations".
Naked all the way, of course...
The
price of the option may increase as the strike price decrease. For
instance, in our original example, paying $2000 now means you can pickup
the macbook pro in 3 months for just a single payment of $10.
Another consideration is that this kind of ordering
of products is typically in practice anyways. Ordering a
non-prebuilt configuration of laptops or cars usually means it will take
anywhere from 2 weeks to a month (or more, for hot items like the
Transformer Prime Tablet from ASUS) before it arrives. So, as a
consumer, I'd like to actually get a discount for that delay.
My friend Waylen suggest that most normal consumers
do not have the sophistication to participate in this kind of market. He
thinks that only for larger purchases like yachts, private jets and
other very high end consumer items would some one put so much energy
into thinking about the future price of the item is. My own personal
feeling is that that's not the case. There are lot of low/mid-class
people, like me, who want expensive stuff and who would also like to be
thrifty while at it. $100 here, $250 there, and quickly our pockets and
lives are enriched at lowered money costs.
But he
is probably right to some extent. Because the laptop is now
considerably commoditized: a "Intel i7, 15" screen, 4grm, 750gb ram"
laptop from Dell, HP, Acer, ASUS, Mitsubishi, Sony, Lenovo are virtually
indistinguishable from each other. Instead of his individual buyers of
single expensive item, I would think that a large computerized firm
would probably be willing to participate in a market like this. By
creating a market, we actually make the system much more efficient.
Additionally allowing individual buyers to participate in this market means I can get just as good a deal as my employer gets.
1 comment:
Okay, okay, all you eye rolling into back of head economists and psychologists. keep this in mind It's the Ninja's approach, not the economists' or MBAs' approach, so it doesn't have to fit in the current equilibriums.
By being a prudent consumer and planning my purchases ahead of time, I should really be systematically rewarded for wanting to buy things, but doing so responsibly. Granted in the short run reduces sales made to impulse buyers, but by making the market more efficient, this business will have in general increased competition and happiness.
Post a Comment